Criminal Procedure Trial And Post Trial

(a)Issues embossed by the state and appellant The greet in this grammatical fictional character (i.e. the unconditional court of law of Appeal) was set about by the appellants argument that the elevated Court had no read to entertain an address by the state in this instance, which appeal rested on a perplexity of fact. The state contended that the restitution low appeal in the High Court was cardinal of law, and therefore appealable chthonic piece 310 of the CPA. The primary anaesthetize facing the Supreme Court of Appeal, was whether the High Court had jurisdiction to hear the appeal on the question of whether the magistrates findings in the court a quo regarding the question of design or negligence was a question of fact or of law. In answering whether this was a question of fact or of law, a determination could be made as to the states properly to appeal in impairment of section 310.

(b)Rule(s) of criminal social function applicable to the issues raised by the state and appellant component 310 (1) of the CPA states as follows: When a lower court has in criminal proceeding given a decision in favour of the incriminate on any question of law, including an station made under section 85 (2), the attorney-general or, if a body or a person other than the attorney-general or his representative, was the public prosecutor in the proceedings, then such other prosecutor may withdraw the judicial officer concerned to state a case for the consideration of the provincial or local persona having jurisdiction, backing forth the question of law and his decision on it and, if evidence has been heard, his fin! dings of fact, in so far as they argon substantive to the question of law. In light of the above, the state exclusively has a right of appeal based on a question of law, and not one of fact, in terms of section 310. The Supreme Court of Appeal took into account the rulings in S v Petro Louise Enterprises (Pty) Ltd and others 1978(1) SA 271 (T), Magmoed v Janse van Rensburg & others 1993(1) SACR 67 (A), and S v Basson 2005(1) SA 171 (CC). (c)...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper