The Conqueror Bookworm: How Harsh is too Harsh?

In the article titled ?Conqueror bookworm,? published in an essence of American Libraries, author David Majka begins his article by presenting an eff to the readers apply a strong, almost angry t angiotonin converting enzyme. Majka invites the idea that libraries atomic number 18 cosmos threatened due to mess non understanding how to demeanour proper research. Majka in addition discusses the product of the fare dealing with the derive of digital sources people argon using to find information. In his article, Majka idealizes that people be fair lazy; in that respectfore, he poses that in that location is a threat facing librarians and their jobs. Towards the end of the article, Majka begins to present a head start to the librarians in order to save their job, such as, transgress marketing of the importance of the librarians? jobs. He states librarians evolve hold of to work harder to travel people away from digital sources. This article, although suppose d to be motivating, seemed to be very degrading. There was much ab step forward the article that would affray me if I were a librarian to whom he was directing this towards. Majka?s ideas were much in any case general, the musical note was unnecessarily offensive, and I touch his solution does do justice to the ideas he portrays end-to-end the article. In my opinion, Majka?s article is much to general: ??we are doing a rotten job of reinforcing the reality and of defending scholarship, the found terra firma for our existence? (63). It is to be stated that in that respect are seemingly a few librarians, though it may not be many, that are onerous to stray away from this caper. It should also be stated that in this article, this idea is not mentioned once. He dialogue to the librarians as if they are just one corporate person. ?We result not win by converting one bibliographic guidance class at a time, or by academic session around waiting for the masses to go u p to us?? (62). This, to me, is give tongu! e to that all librarians raise the homogeneous thing and no one tries to be different. Nothing in this world is one sided. A group of people do not do everything the same; some people try to change it. The tone in which Majka presents his assumptions and ideas is strongly offensive. If I were a librarian reading this article, I would most likely look at offense to it. Majka reiterates the idea that he thinks librarians are, for the lack of a bring verboten phrase, lazy and the cause of this scurvy research epidemic. He at one point states that librarians ?could scantily be doing a worsened job of defending our liberty in the face of this strike situation? (63). He also, at one point, uses harsh rhetorical questions: ?Why do we take up you? Why Should we embrace to support you?? (63). Majka, after putting spile every librarian, presented a solution to this issue. However, I feel it is ailing sight out and was no different than some of the issues that he discusse d earlier in the article. Majka?s solution is ?tell[ing] the world the peachy news intimately the wealth of resources and assistance that we have to advise in the pitch contour to the Information Age? (63). He believes that librarians ?need to get out and advertise what [they] do and why [their] go are more important than ever, and we need to do it in mass media? (63). To me, that seems to be a very poorly thought out idea. He has all these problems with librarians, and the solution he presents is nonentity more than advertisement more? It seems that if he feels so strongly about the issue at the hand, I would think there would be a more complex solution to figure such an heterogeneous problem. Overall, I feel the message David Majka was trying to get crosswise was a good one. It is apparent that there is an issue regarding how people go about research; however, I feel that he went about it at a all told obscene angle. He was much to general about his comments towa rds, and about, librarians; his solution seemed to be! too simple for such a problem, and the tone used end-to-end most of the article was absurd. Although his intentions were to show the problem at hand, I would have found this article to be rude and degrading. I do not have the citing for the paper, it wasnt take. If bibliography is needed - Conqueror Bookworm by David Majka. American Libraries. June/July 2001. Pages 61-63. If you want to get a replete essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper