'Jacksonian Democracy Dbq\r'

'Kathy Dai M. Galvin AP USH Period 1 Jacksonian Democracy DBQ The Jacksonian nation of the 1820s-1830s is often associated with an expanding upon of the policy-making influence, economic opportunities, and sociable coupleity operational to â€Å"the common man,” a concept of the crowd which chair Andrew Jackson and his newfound-fashionedly founded Democratic companionship came to represent. The new brass instrument certainly saw gains for the majority; namely, creation participation in establishment increased to new levels, and some(prenominal) economic decisions were made to favor the pack over monopolies.Beginning with their exaggerated portrayal of the â€Å"corrupt” 1824 preference however, the Jacksonian democrats also left a bequest of substantial miscalculations in policies and acts of hypocrisy that conflicted with their claimed drifts to promote and nurture popular body politic. In particular, the dangerous implications of various policy-ma king and economic policies, along with the deliberate disregard of societal inequality, are aspects of the Jacksonian long time that most irradiately demonstrate discrepancies betwixt Jacksonian ideals and realities.The governmental world saw the start-off advances accredited to the Jacksonian democracy in the forms of all-embracing suffrage and increased government participation, merely it also involved m all enigmatic federal acts that conflicted with the vision of policy-making democracy. With Andrew Jackson’s election in 1828 introducing the first president from westside of the Appalachians, the common men that Jackson championed naturally arose to the political stage as well.States all across the countrified adopted universal suffrage for white staminates on their own in the 1820s, but Jackson thus bolstered the democratic trend through influence in newspapers, popular campaigning, and even a huge fountain party at the White Ho social occasion absolved to the masses. In terms of campaigning however, the election of 1828 was the first in which the political parties directly attacked each other(a)’s candidates through the press.The increase in voter participation led to a negative formula of smear campaigning that aimed more(prenominal) to sway the masses than convey the truth that a healthy democracy needs. Furthermore, Jackson’s presidency was characterized by use of the spoils system and the systematic rotation of officeholders. These stipulated that federal jobs were purely given to loyal Democrats and that federal offices could be held for only one term. While these practices were meant to emphasize equal political opportunities and build party loyalty, they inherently promoted government corruption.In fact, the index number that Jackson wielded by trading federal positions for party loyalty both overextended his administrator power and dependable the kindred corrupt bargaining of office that the Democrat s criminate John Quincy Adams of in the election of 1824. Thus, the Jacksonian democrats dealt put one over detriments and hypocrisies to the system of popular democracy that they so potently advocated, despite their encouragement of universal white male suffrage and participation in office.Similarly, the Jacksonian age affected the economy both in unity with the Jacksonian ideal of equal economic luck and against it; an executive branch act and a juridic branch decision were made with the intent of favoring the people, but substantial opposition highlighted the negative side make that undermined the Jacksonian goal. President Jackson represented the executive branch with his bold move of controverting a board which proposed a rechartering of the Second Bank of the United States.As conveyed by Jackson’s dramatic veto contentedness on July 10, 1832 the democrats maintained that the national bank’s monopoly on trade catered too frequently to opposed and wealthy stockowners, thus posing a holy terror to the ideal of equal economic opportunity that they claimed to value (B). The Jacksonians stuck with their vision of themselves in this sense, but opposing reactions to the veto pointed out that the attack on the bank was inessential and dangerous.Daniel Webster’s reply to the veto correctly maintain that by raising the alarm about an violation of economic freedoms, the Democrats were really harming the stability of the economy needlessly (C). Webster’s analysis was proven accurate by the Panic of 1837, during which a bubble of inflation caused by the end of the national bank was abruptly burst, and several years of depression followed. The recession and unemployment caused indirectly by Jackson’s cancelation of the national bank did more harm to public economic opportunities than good, despite the Jacksonians’ demon-ridden belief in the threat that the Bank posed.Also in 1837 however, Chief Justice Roger Taney ’s Supreme lawcourt decision of Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge was a decisive victory for the Jacksonian ideal of equal economic opportunity. Taney interpreted a 1785 charter for a bridge on the Charles River loosely so that a new bridge could be erected across the same river, thus dispelling a monopoly and financially benefitting the people (H).The Jacksonians simply believed in their roles as the valueors of economic equality, but the results of the changes their administration made were again varied in symmetry with their ideals. Finally, the Jacksonians most clearly drifted from their claimed ideals in the social sphere, as they actively neglected to guard the somebody liberties of nonage groups and women. The Jacksonian’s rosy call for extended suffrage only applied to white males, and the proceeds of slavery was deliberately avoided to prevent unwanted conflicts between the states.In fact, the Jacksonian administration even put in place a â€Å"gag r ule” in 1836 that allowed Congressmen to file away abolition petitions without discussion because the phone numbers and Resolutions of southwestern Carolina threatened independent state action if SC did non receive national and sectional erect in controlling its slaves (F). The slaves quickly lost any support from the proclaimed Jacksonian ideal of case-by-case liberty when pitted against the preservation of the Union.Likewise, the administration did not hesitate to pass the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which revealed that grandiose Jacksonian ideals yielded to the American desire for new land as well. The Act forced thousands of congenital Americans to resettle in the West, with no regard for their person-to-person liberties either. Even President Jackson out unspoilt denied to protect the ideal when he refused to enforce the Supreme butterfly’s decision on Worcester v. Georgia in 1832; John Marshall had ruled that the Cherokee had a right to their land, but Jac kson would not stop the ground forces from pushing the Cherokee out of Georgia regardless.The only test of any agreement with the Jacksonians’ vision of guarding liberties is a romanticized word picture of the Cherokee migration. The painted Cherokees appear comfortable, unified, and still dignified, implying that the painter moldiness have either imagined this as the reality of the function or painted an ideal version of the picture show (G). The painting actually contrasts sharply with the chaos and disaster of the Cherokees’ â€Å"trail of tears,” but it is important that the Jacksonian intent is present. Although the mixtures of realized and neglected Jacksonian ideals in the political and economic ields were more even, the Jacksonians’ goal to preserve individualistic liberty was not entirely lost in the social issues of the age. In conclusion, the Jacksonian democrats certainly believed in their roles as guardians of political democracy, equal ity of economic opportunity, and individual liberty, but their intentions were often misguided or inessential in the face of greater challenges. The few clear strides made by the Jacksonian age were interspersed with instances of adversity in realizing its democratic ideals, particularly in the social sphere.\r\n'