How the Victorian Age Shifted the Focus of Hamlet Essays -- Shakespear

How the squeamish Age Shifted the Focus of juncture nineteenth century critic William Hazlitt praised critical point by saying that, The whole frivol is an exact transcript of what might be supposed to have interpreted pace at the court of Denmark, at the remote period of the era fixed upon. (Hazlitt 164-169) Though it is clearly a testament to the realism of Shakespeares tragedy, at that place is something strange and confusing in Hazlitts analysis. To put it plainly, Hamlet is most emphatically not a realistic form. Not only are the events conveyed in the drama fantastic, the dialogue that brings it to the reader is overdramatic and often metatheatrical. The stirring monologues delivered throughout the crook are theatrical speeches rather than genuine dialogue. Frequent references to acting and theater, specially surrounding the presence of the players, serve to make the audience aware of the play instead of drawing them into it. The tragedys villain oozes evil, murde ring the king and marrying his queen in merely two months. Even more unrealistic is the presence of the kings ghost, surely in that respect werent really any apparitions floating around the court at Denmark. then why does Hazlitt make this statement? Though it is tempting to simply economize him off as a bad critic, similar statements made by other critics of the 19th century suggest that this view of Hamlet as a realist drama was commonly held in the puritanic Era. It seems clear that the ideals of the Victorian era caused a significant change in the way Hamlet was interpreted. Victorian societys high esteem for rationality and utility shifted the focus of Hamlet from the tragedys fantastic nature to its realistic insights. The values of the age imply that a 19th century audience would not appr... ...Schriber is praised for his convincing portrayal of the schoolboyish prince, even though the texts suggests that Hamlets actions are improbable and irrational. (Lahr 46-51) It i s plain to see that the Victorian desire to find reason and practicality still impacts our understanding of William Shakespeares Hamlet. Works Cited Coleridge, Samuel T. Notes on the Tragedies Hamlet. Essays in Criticism. Second ed. Ed. Cyrus Hoy. New York Norton, 1992. 157-164. Hazlitt, William. Characters of Shakespeares Plays Hamlet. Essays in Criticism. Second ed. Ed. Cyrus Hoy. New York Norton, 1992. 164-169. Bradley, A.C. Shakespearean Tragedy. New York Fawcett Premier, 1904. 110-118. Landow, George P. Philosophy Overview. . Cited 12 December 1999. Lahr, John. Fresh Prince Why Liev Schreiber is localise to play Hamlet. The New Yorker December 1999 46-51.