Genetic Engineering: Our Key to a Better World Essay -- Genetic Engine

What is factortic engineering one might ask and why is there so more than moral controversy surrounding the content? transmittable engineering as defined by Pete Moore, is the name effrontery to a wide variety of techniques that remove one thing in common they all allow the biologist to take a gene from one cell and insert it into another (SS1). Such techniques included in genic engineering ( two good and bad) are, inherited screening both during the fetal stage and later in life, gene therapy, sex survival of the fittest in fetuses, and cloning. Because of many ethical, religious, and condom concerns, contractable engineering is the source of much debate and argument. Many people, even scientists, have raised strong questions concerning the issue. In his article Moore raises such questions as, Could the technology get out of control and defame human health or the environment? Who will decide which of the many uses are safe and permissible, and which should be banned? Ho w depose we assess the safety of genetic engineering? (SS1) These questions and similar ones raised by the opposition do hold valid moral and ethical considerations. However, the vast benefits of regulated genetic engineering techniques could greatly improve human health, the environment, and agriculture, and must be allowed to be explored by responsible scientists. Simply put, genetic engineering offers a viable brighter future for our introduction and everyone in it and it must be pursued in a restricted manner so the positive effects can be obtained. The first point that must be made when disceptation for the use of genetic engineering is stressing that genetic engineering must be highly controlled to avoid possible catastrophe. In his book, The Ethics of Genetic Control, Joseph Fletcher describes ... ...seases would besides be eliminated. It is obvious that both sides of the genetic engineering debate have very valid arguments based on their beliefs. However, from the sc ientist standpoint the banning of genetic engineering research and techniques would be a rash mistake. For how can we be what might have been if we never try? And how can with move our world into the future without exploring progress? Therefore, under strict controls, safety precautions, and bans of unethical techniques, genetic engineering could very well be the key to a cave in world and a better life for all. Works CitedFletcher, Joseph. The Ethics of Genetic Control. New York Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1974. Moore, Pete. Genetic Manipulation. New Scientist 13 Nov. 1993 SS1-SS4. Shannon, doubting Thomas A. What Are They Saying About Genetic Engineering? New York Paulist Press, 1985.