The Crucible by Arthur Miller and the Salem Witch Trials Essay

The Crucible by Arthur Miller and the capital of Oregon Witch Trials - Essay ExampleThe play was written in 1953 and presented a dramatized version of the events to such an extent that experts do not certify it as an authentic work on the trials that shook the theocratic society. This paper is an effort to explore the differences and similarities shared by the real-life Salem witch trials and the literary version of that incident The Crucible. The paper will also advocate that the repressive environment of ahead of time modern period was the main cause behind such an event. Salem Witch Trials- A brief Overview Salem Witch Trials are often regarded as the most high-profile case of mass hysteria in annals. From 13th century onwards, religion and moral values took an obsessive form specifically in new-fashioned England and the concept of evil also became deeply embedded, which was symbolized by witches who supposedly possessed demonic powers and pleased the devil by hurting innocent beings1. Gradually each abnormal behavior was associated with witchcraft. In the fall of 1692 two young girls, from the same household in Salem Village, Betty Parris (aged 9) and Abigail Williams (aged 11) started having strange fits and displayed behaviors that were impossibly human and beyond the judgment of doctors and ministers2. They crawled and hid under the furniture, felt that they were being poked or pricked, shouted and threw things on others, and twisted themselves into odd positions. Within no time many a lot of females including Ann Putnam jr. and Elizabeth Hubbard started displaying similar signs and this generated chaos all over Salem. The girls accused Tituba, Sarah Good and Sarah Osborne for casting spells on them and slowly every afflicted individual nominated and accused soul for witchcraft paving the way for a witch-hunt spree and the Salem Witch Trials. The trials were held against hundreds of Salem village residents and nineteen residents (mostly females) were hanged at Gallows Hill whereas one person named Giles Corey was kill to death, and probably dozens languished in prisons without undergoing any trial.3 Historical Inaccuracies in The Crucible Arthur Millers historical accuracy regarding the events and facts of these trials has been a topic of great turn lately. It is, indeed, true that Miller did fictionalize certain facts to suit the needs and demands of a literary play. However, it cannot be termed as an out-and-out inaccurate depiction of the proceedings of Salem Witch trials. As Miller himself explained in the preface of his text this play is not history in the sense in which the word is used by the academic historian. However, I believe that the reader will discover here the essential nature of one of the strangest and most awful chapters in human history4. If the actual facts are to be considered, then Millers version shares some phenomenal contradictions. For instance, in The Crucible, the writer invented a ritual of w ild trip the light fantastic toe in the forest followed by recitation of charms for depicting the activities that were mistaken as witch-craft. 5 This probably was done to ensure maximum interest and engrossment from the audience. However, in reality, Tituba was accused for telling stories from Heinrich Kramers 1687 publication Malleus Maleficarum, which contained concepts like Voodoo, fortune